Repair Request

Your previous prediction has quality issues that need to be addressed. Please generate an improved prediction.

Quality Feedback

{quality_feedback}

{token_change_info}

Your Previous Prediction (word-diff format)

{actual_patch_word_diff}

Instructions

Generate an improved prediction following the same rules and output format from the original instructions. The key rules remain:

• NEVER undo or revert the user's recent edits — if a line was removed in the edit history, do NOT restore it
• If your prediction would make the code more similar to what it was BEFORE the user's edit, output NO_EDITS instead
• When uncertain, predict only the minimal, high-confidence portion of the edit

Output Format

Follow the same output format as before, with one addition:

• If the code is complete as-is and no edits should be made, output NO_EDITS

• NEW: If your previous prediction was actually correct (the quality feedback was overly cautious), output KEEP_PREVIOUS:

  KEEP_PREVIOUS
  

  Use KEEP_PREVIOUS when you determine the original prediction correctly addresses the user's intent despite the feedback.

Important: NO_EDITS and KEEP_PREVIOUS are NOT interchangeable:

• NO_EDITS = make zero changes to the code (discard the previous prediction)
• KEEP_PREVIOUS = the previous prediction is correct, use it as-is

Your Improved Prediction

Briefly explain what was wrong with your previous prediction (or why it was actually correct), then provide the improved output.